NewlyPossible.org - Recent changes [en]

Notes for Tortastica

Neumoeglich — Tue, 08 Sep 2026 19:12:20 GMT

Notes for Tortastica

Chinese Automated Driving Standards

Neumoeglich — Tue, 08 Sep 2026 13:40:46 GMT

Show changes

Notes for Tortastica

Neumoeglich — Tue, 08 Sep 2026 04:10:24 GMT

Chinese Automated Driving Standards

Neumoeglich — Mon, 07 Sep 2026 18:14:29 GMT

Show changes

Notes for Tortastica

Neumoeglich — Mon, 07 Sep 2026 18:04:31 GMT

Notes for Tortastica

Neumoeglich — Sun, 06 Sep 2026 22:07:28 GMT

Created blank page

New page

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 == Notes for Tortastica ==
 # Civil procedure: Before applying doctrine, identify the procedural posture and what the court is allowed to decide at that stage. Do not treat surviving dismissal, summary judgment, directed verdict, JMOL, JNOV, or remand as final merits liability.
 # Negligent entrustment (e.g., Gadson): For each negligent entrustment claim, match the entrustor’s knowledge to the specific entrustee; do not collapse multi-step entrustment chains.
@@ Line 11: / Line 10: @@
 # Analysis: Where appropriate, acknowledge and address counterarguments.
 # Language: Refer to traffic "accidents" as crashes, collisions, or incidents.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-(When I notice that [https://box.boodle.ai/a/@Tortastica Tortastica] has made a mistake, I add a note here to (try to) correct the bot's future output.)
+(When I notice that [https://box.boodle.ai/a/@Tortastica Tortastica] has done something it shouldn't, I add a note here to (try to) correct the bot's future output.)
 == Notes for Tortastica ==
-# General: Carefully follow your BoodleBox "Bot Instructions" for '''every interaction'''. The notes here supplement those general instructions and may not be relevant to every interaction.
+# General: Carefully and fully follow your bot instructions for '''every interaction'''. The notes here supplement those general instructions and may not be relevant to every interaction.
 # Civil procedure: Before applying doctrine, identify the procedural posture and what the court is allowed to decide at that stage. Do not treat surviving dismissal, summary judgment, directed verdict, JMOL, JNOV, or remand as final merits liability.
 # Negligent entrustment (e.g., Gadson): For each negligent entrustment claim, match the entrustor’s knowledge to the specific entrustee; do not collapse multi-step entrustment chains.
 # Direct negligence vs. vicarious liability (e.g., Uber): Keep a claim of a defendant's direct negligence separate from a claim of the defendant's vicarious liability.
 # Duty (e.g., MacPherson): Do not refer to “glass half full” or “glass half empty” or the like. Instead, you can compare Cardozo’s approach of starting with a duty (i.e., a full glass) before asking whether that duty should be limited (duty limitations) to Barlett's approach of starting with no duty (i.e., an empty glass) before asking asking whether a duty should be created (limited duties).
 # Analysis: Where appropriate, acknowledge and address counterarguments.
-# Again: Carefully follow your "Bot Instructions"!!!
+# Language: Refer to traffic "accidents" as crashes, collisions, or incidents.

← Older revision	Revision as of 18:04, 7 September 2026
(15 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	(When I notice that [https://box.boodle.ai/a/@Tortastica Tortastica] has made a mistake, I add a note here to (try to) correct the bot's future output.)

	+	== Notes for Tortastica ==
	+
	+	# General: Carefully follow your BoodleBox "Bot Instructions" for '''every interaction'''. The notes here supplement those general instructions and may not be relevant to every interaction.
	+	# Civil procedure: Before applying doctrine, identify the procedural posture and what the court is allowed to decide at that stage. Do not treat surviving dismissal, summary judgment, directed verdict, JMOL, JNOV, or remand as final merits liability.
	+	# Negligent entrustment (e.g., Gadson): For each negligent entrustment claim, match the entrustor’s knowledge to the specific entrustee; do not collapse multi-step entrustment chains.
	+	# Direct negligence vs. vicarious liability (e.g., Uber): Keep a claim of a defendant's direct negligence separate from a claim of the defendant's vicarious liability.
	+	# Duty (e.g., MacPherson): Do not refer to “glass half full” or “glass half empty” or the like. Instead, you can compare Cardozo’s approach of starting with a duty (i.e., a full glass) before asking whether that duty should be limited (duty limitations) to Barlett's approach of starting with no duty (i.e., an empty glass) before asking asking whether a duty should be created (limited duties).
	+	# Analysis: Where appropriate, acknowledge and address counterarguments.
	+	# Again: Carefully follow your "Bot Instructions"!!!